Friday, January 20, 2006

 

For those strategic voters out there check out democratics Space seat projections

Hill and knowlton also has a similar set up where by you can play with the swing vote to see who will win. Or how much swing is needed to make a change. I'm not exactly boned up on these projectors but they seem to be using the results from the last election as a basis to project. If so they may be very out to lunch with the way this election has turned out.

I did a little swing vote projecting in NL and the two that stood out the most to be accurate were
RANDOM-BURIN-ST.GEORGE’S with a 7% swing vote from the Liberals to the NDP the NDP would win. Even more so what with the Liberals lack of action on the Portnoy case.
BONAVISTA-GANDER-GRAND FALLS-WINDSOR would elect a Conservative if there were a swing vote of 10% from Liberal to Conservative.
IMHO Avalon is a whole new ball game with efford gone and the 2004 election results aren't applicable.
Labrador is a lost cause mainly due to the fact that they only get the CBC as a news source IMHO. Can you say conflict of interest!
HUMBER-ST.BARBE-BAIE VERTE well personally I think it's going to a close race but who knows?
Comments:
We should not be promoting stratigic voting. This is no way to choose the government that will lead and develope us.

Remember, if you vote for a BAD government to get rid of a WORSE government, all you left with is a BAD government.

If you want a GOOD governement (which everyone does) you must vote FOR a GOOD government. This strategic voting has got to go.

Stephen
http://newfoundlandgreenparty.blogspot.com
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]